Could Final Cut Pro Go the Way of Aperture?
I have a new article on Medium.
Does Apple's tendency to run hot and cold on Final Cut Pro mean that it there is any threat to its future?
I have a new article on Medium.
Does Apple's tendency to run hot and cold on Final Cut Pro mean that it there is any threat to its future?
One of the things which struck me as odd is that despite the media browser section having access to Aperture’s library, there was no sign of any video clips in the browser. This seemed to me like a massive missed opportunity from Apple but it seems I may have been a bit harsh. This looks like it is a bug not a missing feature as video is mentioned in the FCPX help. As such, I hope it gets fixed soon.
You can find the knowledge base article here
The help is a little unclear so here is what my experiments have shown:
... and your point is?
If you are someone who shoots mixed stills and video on DSLRs like I do then Aperture is often your first point of call for capture. I have already written about my workflow here. If you are using Aperture then both stills and video are ingested and you are already making decisions about organisation. Whilst Aperture can’t currently modify video images the way it can with stills, you still have the ability to trim, grade (stars and flags) and key word. It also has a robust library with the vault backup option. With no log and capture anymore, Aperture can fill some of the gap.
Even when Apple fixes the bugs, I still think they could go further with the integration. It would be nice not to have to duplicate the primary assets and it seems a shame to lose any effort you may have put into key wording in Aperture.